should PSLE be abolished - 940 Words

‘I am all for slaying the PSLE sacred cow,’ wrote a member of parliament in his blog. The Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) issue once again came under the spotlight. Popular opinions have been rising for scrapping the PSLE, for it puts unnecessary stress on young students and limits their holistic development. However, proponents of the system have been equally strong in their support for the exam, arguing that no viable alternative exists to ensure the fairness of selection. According to an online poll, the PSLE has been ranked the top ten most pressing issues faced by Singaporeans. It is high time for us to engage in the debate, as education is becoming more and more important in determining the future of a child and the the†¦show more content†¦The repeated drilling in such areas usually backfire in reducing students’ passion, which defeats the purpose of education. The PM Lee recently pointed out the increasing availability of choice as a way to alleviate the problems of the national exam. For example, we can enhance the exercise of the Direct School Admission that allows students talented in non-academic areas to be admitted before they go for the leaving exam. Moreover, we may also set up some pilot secondary schools that admit students based on their own standard other than the PSLE, and parents have the choice to opt out the PSLE to go for such schools. Academic performance and practice of such schools will be monitored by the MOE to assess the viability of such academic alternative. Increasing choice is critical to reducing stress of students and parents. Because it is not an absolute necessity to go through the PSLE to enter a good school, students will have more freedom to pursue their interests and develop their qualities in other areas. But at the end of the day, we still need to have some scheme to differentiate capabilities, reward talents and provide incentives for hard work. It may not be a wise decision to scrap the PSLE. But rather, we need to diversify the schemes of assessments to discover different talents, while still maintaining fairness of education that isShow MoreRelatedExams Should Be Abolished7511 Words   |  31 Pages: Miss Kong [SHOULD WRITTEN EXAMS SHOULD BE ABOLISHED?] â€Æ' Written Exams Should Be Abolished Lee Chan Wai, Albert Li, Lim Shi Ping, Liu Bo Zhou, Liu Yi Heng Raffles Institution Mentor: Miss Kong In the current era when students young and old are required to take written exams, to assess them, to judge them, life then is under tremendous demands. Little time or space is left for other activities, activities that bring life to the schooling students. Written exams be then abolished, for the good

Affirmative Action In The Workplace Essay - 1899 Words

The term affirmative action describes policies aimed at a historically socio-politically non-dominant group (typically, minority men or women of all races) intended to promote access to education or employment. Motivation for affirmative action is a desire to redress the effects of past and current discrimination that is regarded as unfair.[who?] It also serves to encourage public institutions such as universities, hospitals and police forces to be more representative of the population[1]. This is commonly achieved through targeted recruitment programs aimed at applicants from socio-politically disadvantaged groups. In some cases affirmative action involves giving preferential treatment to these groups.[2] Opponents of affirmative action†¦show more content†¦(Read Thomas Sowells Affirmative Action Around The World and Basic and Applied Economics) It also causes unprepared applicants to be accepted in highly demanding educational institution or jobs which result in eventual failure. (See, for example, Richard Sanders study of affirmative action in Law School and bar exam). Lastly, by lowering the bar, it denies those who strive for excellence on their own merit the sense of real achievement. (See, for example, Clarence Thomas My Grandfathers Son: A Memoir.) Some argue that affirmative action itself has some merit when it is targeted to true cause of social deprivation such as poverty while race, ethnicity or gender based affirmative action is misguided.[3] Some opponents claim that affirmative action is not necessary when looking at how past groups that suffered from extensive oppression like Asian, Jewish, Arab, Irish, Eastern European and Southern European Americans, all of whom are groups of people that were also discriminated against within society in the past and never received any benefits from an affirmative action system and have (they claim) done perfectly fine if not better than average in American society today. A study has noted that on some campuses, such as the University of California, Berkeley where affirmative action was abolished by Proposition 209, Asian American students, who already face discrimination on college campuses, would be theShow MoreRelatedAffirmative Action in the Workplace997 Words   |  4 PagesAffirmative Action in the Workplace Negative and Positive Rebecca Mikell Human Resources BUS362 Affirmative action in this time and place is a very hard area to keep in place when it comes to keeping jobs even at work for the employees. Sometimes this type of equality in the working world can be good and sometimes it can be bad, but it depends on how it is used that really makes how a person can feel when it comes to this type of treatment of employees no matter what color or sexRead MoreAffirmative Action in the Workplace1282 Words   |  5 PagesAffirmative Action in the Workplace Introduction The Civil Rights Act of 1964 empowered minorities in many different ways, most notably in prohibiting discrimination in the workplace. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act expressly prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, promotion, pay, benefits and other aspects of employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin (U.S. Department of Labor, 2012). This law was seen as a major boon to minorities and women in the workforce whoRead MoreAffirmative Action On The Workplace1422 Words   |  6 PagesAffirmative Action in the Workplace Affirmative action for many years has been viciously misinterpreted by many employers and managers that hire new employees. Affirmative action was designed to eliminate any discrimination among qualified employees that were competing for a job. However, in recent years it has backfired and created an entirely new discrimination. This problem arises when companies are told to meet a certain quota for each different race and gender no matter what the circumstancesRead MoreWorkplace Discrimination And Affirmative Action2174 Words   |  9 Pagespaper is on workplace discrimination and the effects affirmative action has on it. Workplace discrimination transpires when an employee suffers from unfavorable or unfair treatment due to race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or other legally protected characteristic (Fevre, Grainger, and Brewer, 2011). The journal articles examined present different approaches and views concerning workplace discrimination, unethical activities in the workplace, and affirmative action effects andRead MoreAffirmative Action Policies Should Be Implemented891 Words   |  4 PagesAffirmative Action Policies Should be Implemented Affirmative action policies should be implemented to improve to help propel the company forward. Affirmative action can be a useful tool to help create diversity in the workplace. Implementing affirmative action policies will encourage growth in the company because we will be able to effectively select and hire people, not on the basis of race but on actual qualifications that make a person suitable for a position in the company. Affirmative actionRead MoreImagine A Student Named Billy Is Applying For A Scholarship.1001 Words   |  5 Pagesdidn’t. The answer is affirmative action. Affirmative action is an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer from discrimination, and it is an outdated program that is creating unequal opportunities for non-diverse people. The history of affirmative action goes back farther than one might think. Affirmative action is not a new concept. It has been around since the 1961 when President John F. Kennedy signed an executive order that told employers to take â€Å"affirmative action to ensure that applicantsRead MoreAn Ethical Dilemma: Affirmative Action, Do We Still Need It?1706 Words   |  7 PagesEthical Dilemma: Affirmative Action, Do We Still Need It? An Ethical Dilemma: Affirmative Action, Do We Still Need It? Abstract This paper discusses the importance of affirmative action in today’s society and the ethical role it plays when Employers and Universities are considering entry to their respected places of establishment. The paper will conclude with what America will face in the future in terms of affirmative action. An Ethical Dilemma: Affirmative Action, Do We Still NeedRead MoreAffirmative Action774 Words   |  4 PagesAffirmative action is a practice that is intended to promote opportunities for the â€Å"protected class† which includes minorities, woman, and people with disabilities or any disadvantaged group for that matter. With affirmative action in place people of this protected class are given an even playing field in terms of hiring, promotion, as well as compensation. Historically, affirmative action is only known to have protected African Americans and woman; however that is not the case. Affirmative actionRead MoreAffirmative Action : Discrimination Against Minorities1513 Words   |  7 PagesOthmane Ezzabdi AP Seminar Affirmative Action Affirmative action has been apart of the work environment in America since the 1960s until present time. Its main goal has been to suppress the discrimination against minorities and to give them a fighting chance to succeed in achieving their goal of living the American dream all in an act to counter the inexcusable racism and discrimination that has been inhumanely placed on to the minorities over a century ago in the United States; it will ultimatelyRead MoreAffirmative Action1160 Words   |  5 PagesAffirmative Action Marlene S. Smith MGT/434 October 28, 2013 Thomas Affirmative Action Affirmative action is an action that was purposefully designed to provide full and equal opportunities for employment and education for women, minorities, and other individuals belonging to disadvantaged groups. This paper will assess the rudiments of Affirmative Action as it applies to public and private sector employers. The paper will also evaluate what employers are subject to affirmative action

Business Ethics Ethical Decision Making Process

Question: Discuss about the Business Ethics for Ethical Decision Making Process. Answer: Introduction: Stakeholders can be known as persons or companies that rise to gain or lose from the achievement or collapse of a structure. As, with definition, stakeholders are individuals who are influenced by the project their prospects require to be taken into account in sort for a project to accomplished. Stakeholders views can be positive or negative in context of a given project, and frequently do not accord with one another, making it a provocation to reunite their diverse outlook (Brink, 2011). Googles has varied stakeholders due to the reason of huge agglomeration of goods. An organizations assortment consists of its innovative goods like, Google Search, along with current goods such as cable television service, Google Glass and Google Fiber Internet (Meyer, 2016). The companies stakeholders come from different groups influenced with these diverse businesses. To sustain their leadership as a pioneering technology company, Google should tackle the benefit of their stakeholders by the help of appropriate corporate social responsibilities approaches. Organization recent CSR attempts are inclusive and acceptable, established on international standards and prospects. Yet, there is scope to get better these CSR attempts to make Google a tough competitor on the international ground (Morland, 2011). Googles stakeholders affect the companys tactical ways. This affect is revealed in the corporate social responsibility approaches and programs enforced inan organization (Ferrell, Frae drich and Ferrell, 2016). There are various types of stakeholders, which can be categorized on shared interest based. They are users, employees, advertisers and other customers, investors, governments, communities Users: These are the consumers using Google goods, not necessarily paying for these. Users are essential for company because their attitude makes firms popularity, which makes value (Daniel, 2012). Employees: They are interested in appropriate compensation and rewards, along with definition of firms abilities. Company looks towards high salaries, incentives and benefits. Advertisers and Other Customers: These are the major medium of firms revenue, and are interested in getting efficient services. They illustrate companies monetary presentation. Investors: These are interested in firms growing profits, they are essential as they predict the capital required in business (Meyer, 2016). Governments: They affect company with the rules and legislations and are interested in companies regulatory compliance. Communities: They are interested in direct and indirect benefits of the firm. Company can benefit them with charity, and associated activities (Daniel, 2012). Generally, Googles corporate social responsibility presentation is acceptable. The firm has schedule and strategies that predict the interests of all category of stakeholder. The firms philosophy,concentrate on the user and everyone else will chase, has compel to valuable and accepted goods that make the business gainful and advantageous to users, customers and investors. Furthermore, the companys philosophy,money can be made without performing unpleasant, drives Google to engage in corporate social responsibility actions that profits the stakeholder groups of human resources and communities and convince authoritarian necessities (Ferrell, Fraedrich and Ferrell, 2016). As stated in the case study, Google keeps on modernizing the working conditions, due to the reason they wants employees to work with full relieve, like they have allowed employees to bring their pets in an organization, which is not a ordinary concept for a renowned company like Google. Firms major aim and core value concept is to permit employees to do their best and make them to feel no pressure while doing job. Consumers utilize various resources of the Google on daily basis. Google search engine is the most utilized tool of the company, which receives millions of searches on daily basis. This makes users to collect and gain knowledge on daily basis and this information can be utilized in schools learning, projects and in bigger issues faced by the users in their lives. Android operating system and mailing system of Google assist people to be connected with anybody in the world and can even entertain themselves (Meyer, 2016). Google attain their major income from the advertising tool, they promote the products of other organizations to gain profits. Google search engine is used on daily basis, users can view advertisements on this site, and if finds best can purchase products, which will benefit both the other company and users. Google also prefer charity and allow their employees a day off for volunteering and helping those in need. This concept of charity can create a major change in the life of needy peoples, a small help can also generate a wide difference in their lives. These are all preferred ways of Google serving their stakeholders (Daniel, 2012). References Brink, A. (2011) Corporate Governance and Business Ethics. New York: Springer Science Business Media Daniel (2012) Google: The Quest to Balance Privacy With Profit. Available at: https://danielsethics.mgt.unm.edu/pdf/google-the-quest-to-balance-privacy-with-profits.pdf (Accessed: 24 January, 2017) Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J. and Ferrell (2016) Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making Cases. USA: Cengage Learning Freeman, R. E. (2010) Strategic Management:A Stakeholder Approach. UK: Cambridge University Press Meyer, P. (2016) Google Stakeholders Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Available at: https://panmore.com/google-stakeholders-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-analysis (Accessed: 24 January, 2017) Morland, M. P. and Bos, R. T. (2011) Business Ethics and Continental Philosophy. UK: Cambridge University Press

Othello Themes Essays (445 words) - Othello, Iago, Roderigo

Othello Themes Lots of times people get love and lust confused. In Shakespeare's Othello, the characters in this book are very confused about the difference and it results in perplexity, confusion, commotion and death. This is shown in Shakespeare's use of symbolism, characterization and irony. The person who best illustrates this theme is Roderigo. He tells Iago, "That thou, Iago, who hast had my purse," to get Desdemona for himself. (I,I,2) He pays Iago to get Desdemona, not knowing that he really is not in love with her. This portrays lust on Roderigo's part. Othello, on the other hand, is in love with Desdemona and doesn't have sex with her until they are married, and because of his respect for her. He had"rather be a toad and live upon the vapor of a dungeon than keep a corner in the thing I love for other's uses."(III,iii, 287) Othello evidently portrays love in this play. Later, in the play, Othello starts to hate Desdemona and won't give credence to a word she says. When Iago's scheme to split up Desdemona and Othello begins to work, Othello's love for her gradually diminishes. Desdemona's "napkin is too little", for Othello.(III,iii,303) This quote symbolizes Desdemona's love for Othello. As the play goes on, Othello starts calling Desdemona a strumpet, or whore and "each drop she falls would prove a crocodile."(III,I,248) In other words, Desdemona is like a crocodile which sheds hypocritical tears. The irony used by Shakespeare also explains the love and lust theme of this play. Roderigo and Iago are the main characters that depict irony for love and lust. They both are convinced that they are in love with Desdemona. However, all they really want is the sexual fragment of the relationship. Iago pays Roderigo to get Desdemona for him, so obviously he thinks he can't get her himself or doesn't want a real relationship with her. The melancholy thing about this play is that Desdemona has no concept about what is going on. She has no evidence that her love life is being torn apart right before her eyes. In conclusion, with the use of characterization, symbolism and irony, Shakespeare proves that oftentimes people get confused about their feelings. Today, I think people are more confused about what real love is because if they weren't, there would not be as many abuses, divorces or affairs. The amount of divorces has tripled since the1980's. People also get married because of pregnancy which often results in spousal abuse and child abuse because the father will get involved in something he doesn't want to do, which makes him angry and he takes it out on the wife. So as I concluded, people repeatedly get love and lust confused and Shakespeare does an astonishing job of defining it.